A marketing research of consumer attitudes

http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;consumers and thus is specifically relevant to the
charset=utf-8">current study. (Patton, 2002)
IntroductionThe study applied an easy investigational design where
While prosperous consumers in wealthy countries paytwo different versions of a survey were at random
quite a few dollars for a cup of coffee at store suchgiven to participants, and thus, crafting a control and
as Starbucks, some millions of small scale coffeealso an experimental cluster. The difference among
farmers are struggle since prices for coffee beanthe surveys was the exclusion or inclusion of
have tumbled to extraordinary lows. This juxtapositionanti-coffee roasters information at the start of the
of the stylish coffee explosion and rock-bottom rawsurvey. The coffee roasters information entailed of
coffee prices has stricken market criticism asallegations of unfair trade labour practices
compelling proof of injustice and also exploitation. Theprocurements of coffee bean by roasters from
critics are blaming multinational coffee roasters and thefarmers in Latin America and Asia. The company was
retailers for making profits at the expense of poorselected because of its prominence in the question.
farmers. The consumer are critics are proposing(Patton, 2002)
several scheme which, includes “fair trade”One part of the survey had a succession of
coffee, using of fresh quality standards in restrictingstatements applying a five-point Likert scale to
imports, and returning to political control of coffeemeasure responses, varying from 1 to 5 (with higher
export, so as to help coffee farmers through pulling upnumerals showing high levels of agreement). The other
coffee bean prices.section of the survey asked if the participants had
This proposed research will explore the basis ofheard of coffee roasters unfair trade coffee and if the
consumer attitudes towards fair-trade coffee when itbuy coffee at these roasters or whether they will
is found unfair. This research will draw from thecontinue buying coffee at the roasters. Each
findings and implications of previous performedinvestigation started with questions connected to
research and data to provide clarity to the underlyingdemography (age and gender) and ended with a
factors of:succession of open-ended queries where participants
can remark on the matters raised and also on the
Problem Statementstudy itself. (Patton, 2002)
Fair Trade coffee labelling has offered a sign ofResults
standards which relates to material coffee flavour,Attitudes
however has more than all linked the socialTwo of the 10 questions concerning attitudes exposed
relationships of consumption and production in themajor differences among the cluster which received
qualities of the coffee. It creates the representation ofanti- coffee roasters information and the cluster which
an evaluation of coffee chain relations among farmers,did not receive any information (Table 1). Some of the
the producers, the retailers and the consumers into thestatements were, “When I think of the
materialism of the collection of coffee, with the “fairManner in which companies exploit farmers, I get
trade” coffee imputing a relationship amid the livesfrustrated and annoyed”.
of low-earner farmers and the prosperous consumers
De Pelsmacker and Glenn (2005) However, introducingBehaviour
the fair trade coffee, labelled as been observed byJust one statement connecting to actual behaviour
other experts and a way for coffee roasters to hideexposed a major difference among the two clusters (
behind the scenes as the farmers are still not wellTable 2). The cluster which did not get the anti- coffee
compensated in terms of their sale, Uusitalo androasters information had a considerably high level of
Oksanen (2003). This issue has continued to drawconcurrence with the statement, “Consumers ought
debate on how the consumer behaviour are affectedto pay extra for products which are produced through
in knowing that in deed the “fair traded” labelledunfair trade practices”.
coffee is truly not fair- tradedParticipants were asked also to point out if they would
There is indelible evidence about retailers andbuy coffee roasters products infuture. Across all
producers who are selling unfairly traded coffee as fairclusters, 68 % of participants specified that they
trade coffee by merely labelling it to their consumers.continued buying the coffee roasters products, while
However when consumer find out they reactonly 12 % stated that they won’t buy, but 20%
differently as this is unethical marketing behaviour. Withwere uncertain).
increasing number of consumer becoming moreTable 1: Statements measuring attitudes (affect)
conscious in ethical marketing, the research will seek toStatements
find out how their attitudes changes in relation o thisNo-information
issue. This researcher proposes to study the directAnti- coffee roasters information
relationship consumer behaviour and attitudes towardsMean deviation
retailers after discovery fair trade coffee to be unfairI am incensed when thinking of the harm done to
coffeefarmers by unfair trade
3.78
Purpose of the Study4.00
The purpose of this quantitative study is to gain factual0.073
information from the consumer to examine how andWhen thinking of the manner companies exploit
to what extent their consumer attitudes change afterfarmers, I get frustrated and annoyed
discovery of buying or consuming coffee which is3.87
unfairly traded, but sold as fair traded. Prior studies on4.12
this subject matter have revealed that when0.031*
customers become a ware of unethical behaviour ofI think people worry so much about trade practices
concerning a product or a company, their behaviour3.91
and attitudes changes to an extent. (Dean, 2004)3.88
0.797
Consumer behaviour:People should not buy coffee produced by unfair trade
Consumer behaviour is defined as the study of whypractices
people buy, what they buy, when they buy and how3.89
the do the buying. This blends various elements from3.70
economics, anthropology, socio-psychology, sociology0.153
and psychology. In this there is an attempt toUnfair trade practices do not affect me personally
understand the entire decision making process for the2.67
buyers both as groups and as individuals. In this there is3.61
the study of the individual characteristics of the0.001*
consumers. They include the psychographics,*significant at level at 95% confidence interval
behavioural variables and demographics. Unless aTable 2; statements measuring consumer behaviour
company carries out research on consumer behaviour,Statements
then there are high chances that the company can failNo information
to meet what the consumers want. (Hoyer andCluster mean
MacInnis, 2000)Anti- coffee roasters information. Group mean
Fair trade: fair trade or Ethical consumerism identifiesSignificance of mean differences
the huge amounts of efforts required to obtainI am ready to stop purchasing coffee from companies
information concerning products, in addition to thewith unfair practices
usually high prices of ethically-good products, as3.43
barriers to make ethical selections. This model of3.26
consumerism, just like the start of “green”0.311
consumerism in the past, is becoming to be a moreConsumers should pay more for fair trade products
significant principle in Western nations, mostly as3.19
international trade raises up (Uusitalo and Oksanen282
2003).0.047*
I will donate to organizations to improve the conditions
Research Questionof farmers
The questions designed for this research are:2.88
(1) How does consumer behaviours changes when3.08
they discover that they are being sold unfair trade0.319
instead of fair trade coffeeI will pay more for coffee made by fair trade practices
(2) To what degree does consumer attitudes changes3.13
when they discover that they are being sold unfair3.32
trade instead of fair trade coffee0.923
Research DesignI would make a personal sacrifice to halt unfair trading
This research was carried out using qualitativepractices
research methods. The methods used to get3.35
information are through interviewing and through3.36
questionnaires, which were designed to get specific0.954
information from the respondent. The aim of the*significant at level at 95% confidence interval
research is to find out the change of consumerDiscussion
behaviour after finding out they are buying unfair tradeThere was barely limited proof to support the first
which being sold as fair trade. (Grunert, 1988)hypothesis while the subsequent hypothesis was
mainly supported, amid the exemption of one
Methodologyunanticipated outcome. Maybe the first hypothesis did
not get support since the unfair trade information is not
The research was conducted in the Bolton; thefresh information for a lot of the respondents. More
research was based on 200 consumers whothan a third of participants had really heard specifically
consume coffee. The consumer chosen were awareabout the unfair trade coffee campaign. Since this is
of the fair trade coffee and unfair trade coffee. Foramong many campaigns tackling this issue, it is
the sake of keeping the data to managerial size, it wasplausible that lots of more participants would have
thought that the research should concentrate basicallygotten some kind of negative information concerning
on a small number of the participants.multinational coffee roasters and dealers. It is possible
there would have been major differences supposing
Methods of Data Collectionone cluster had completely no prior information of the
Standardized questions were prepared and asked tomatter and were thus giving an instant emotional
all participants. The questions will be asked toanswer. (Auger, et al, 2003)
consumers of coffee. The researcher will carry outWhat does this mean for consumers?
the interviews. Participants will be required to adhereThe main difficulty with this kind of research, a position
to, and sign a confidentiality agreement to alleviate thethat many researchers in this subject have concluded,
propensity of identities being revealed.is that the ethical consumerism can’t be
Delimitationscondensed to if a consumers will stay away from an
unfair traded (unethical unsound) product. Whether
The delimitations of this research effort are the typesconsumers do not buy products prepared by use child
of Assertive Discipline models that will be used; thelabour, for instance, it does not essentially imply that
experiences of the consumer being observed as wellthose children in the developing countries will be
as the consequences of other factors will delimit thehappier. Hence, besides other factors previously
research.identified, several well-meaning consumers might really
consider that boycotting will do further harm than
Limitationsbuying ethically-unsound items. Consumers might also
The limitations of this research include but are notbelieve that all coffee producers and roasters employ
confined to the consumers and others who willsame unfair trade practices, and consequently believe
participate voluntarily in the study, the consumerthat purchasing new brands will not create any
standards and predisposed cultural tolerances anddifference. In spite of the findings in this research and
allowances.other previous studies, it is realistic to presume that
activist pressure groups and coffee companies will
Data Analysis Procedurescarry on increasing information or advertisements
Compiled data will be inputted into an Excelcampaigns as two sides try to convince consumers. It
Spreadsheet by the researcher along with anecdotalis most likely that activist pressure groups will just turn
notes from the field observations of this study.into being extra emotionally forceful in their tone of
campaigns in an effort to draw out desired reactions.
ReviewOn the same note the targeted companies also will
Barnett, et al (2005) conceptualises business ethics asjust as forcefully react to these off-putting campaigns
being part of a product growth process, eitherwith much more advertisements, if not to counteract
negatively or positively, and he argues that businessthe claims, then least to drown them. (Auger, et al
ethics can’t be regarded in isolation away from2003)
the main products and brands. Nonetheless, theWhile consumers continue being exposed to such sort
thought of business ethics has barely come on theof campaigns, it should be anticipated that it will
front position during the past decade. Crane (2001)increasingly become difficult for consumer to settle the
notes the analogous amid the phenomenal appearancedivergence messages and sense confident enough to
of human rights, environmental and labour activistmake informed decisions. (Spar, and Lane, 2003)
associations and the development in ubiquity ofFuture Research
international brands as from the mid 1990s. DeThere are numerous ways for future studies in this
Pelsmacker and Glenn (2005) did also discuss thefield of consumerism, one option for further study is to
increase of the ethical consumerism and made ainvestigate whether a source of negative information,
conclusion that even though ethical consumption is notfor example word-of-mouth, or advertising and
until now prevalent, there is “anti-sentiment” whichcredibility of the source are significant factors
is directed against international brands for being(Ahluwalia et al. 2000).
perceived with unethical behaviour. Uusitalo and
Oksanen (2003) defined ethical consumerism asConclusion
tackling “the social and environmental consequencesSubstantial number of previous studies indicate that
of global trade”.consumer value the ethical aspect of products, that
There exists limited literature on fair trade coffeethey have a positive attitude, however the studies
relation to consumer behaviour, however, Literatureshow that behavioural patterns of the consumers are
review on existing consumer studies suggest thatnot univocally consistent with the attitudes. This study
though many consumers convey their willingness towas aimed at determining if negative information
pay extra for fair traded manufactured products, justregarding a company’s trading practices would
a small number is presently capable or truly willing toresult in any changes of behaviour and attitudes and . It
pay a extra for the products. Thus, though consumerscan cautiously be drawn that the anti- coffee roasters
might have an affirmative behaviour and attitude, theyinformation to consumers did provoke a little
are mostly inactive in their function as consumers inannoyance and frustration; however this is observed
relation to supporting fair trade enhancements withas not adequate to make a consumer change his/ her
their existing resources. For instance in the relation tobehaviours.
organic products, Shaw et al, (2005) revealed that, aReferences
positive attitude doesn’t essentially result to theAhluwalia, R and Rao U. H (2000): Consumer
wished behaviour. In another case provided from aResponse to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role
research about purchasing intents for coffee labelledof Commitment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37
fair trade, (De Pelsmacker et al., 2003). Even though(2), 203-214.
11% of the Britain buyers stated that fair-trade isAuger, P et al (2003): What Will Consumers Pay for
very-important, market share of the fair trade coffeeSocial Product Features,” Journal of Business Ethics,
stay put under 1% in England42 (3), 281-304,
Many previous studies have queriedBarnett, C et al (2005): Consuming Ethics; Articulating
consumers’ consciousness of ethical issuesthe Subjects and Spaces of Ethical Consumption,”
(Uusitalo and Oksanen 2004; Corrigan and AttallaAntipode 37 (1), 23-45
2001), where consumers considered to be uncertainCarrigan, M and Attalla, A (2001): “The myth of the
concerning which items are fairly traded and whichethical consumer — do ethics matter in
one are not. Nevertheless, a study carried out bypurchase behaviour?” Journal of Consumer
Corrigan and Attalla’s (2001), concluded that,Marketing, 18 (7), 560-577.
unethical trading changes only a small number ofChisnall, P.M. (1992): Marketing: A Behavioural Analysis,
consumers behaviours. As Barnett et al. (2005) arguesMcGraw-Hill; London.
there are obvious political aspects to ethicalCrane, A (2001): “Unpacking the Ethical Product,”
consumption that can be viewed as a structure ofJournal of Business Ethics, 30 (4), 361-373.
combined, organised communal action, and maybeDawar, Niraj and Madan M. Pillutla (2000): “Impact of
perceived by a lot of consumers as merely aProduct-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating
“fringe” social pressure group that they do not ofRole of Consumer Expectations,” Journal of
necessity wish to relate. Purchasing products forMarketing Research, 37 (2), 215-226.
helpful reasons (for example environmentally-friendlyDean, D Hal (2004): Consumer Reaction to Negative
items) or boycotting some products for variousPublicity: Effects of
negative reasons (for example not purchasing shoesCorporate Reputation, Response, and Responsibility for
made by child labour). (Shaw. et al, 2005)a Crisis Event”, Journal of Business Communication,
Present research41 (2), 192-211.
The present research aims at determining whetherDe Pelsmacker, P and Glenn R (2005), “Do
“knowing” that coffee is unethical, i.e. unfair tradeConsumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for
coffee being sold as fair trade coffee would have aFair-Traded Coffee”, Journal of Consumer Affairs,
bigger impact on consumer behaviour and attitudes.39 (2), 363-385.
That is to say, if information concerning the unethicalGrunert, K.C. (1988): Research in Consumer Behaviour:
practices of coffee company or store were at theBeyond Attitudes and Decision Making, European
frontage of a consumer’s mind, would he orResearch, Vol. 16.
she take it into account? Therefore the first hypothesisHoyer W and MacInnis D (2000): Consumer Behaviour,
of this research is that:2nd Ed Houghton Mifflin
- If consumer becomes aware that a product beingHenard, D. H. (2002): “Negative Publicity: What
sold as fair traded is in fact unfairly traded, they willCompanies Need to Know About Public Relations,”
have negative attitudes the company selling thatPublic Relations Quarterly, 47 (4), 8-12.
product.Loudon, D.L. (1988): Consumer Behaviour; Concepts
- To what degree does consumer attitudes changesand Applications, McGraw Hill, London
when they discover that they are being sold unfairNicholls G and Alexander J (2002): “Strategic options
trade instead of fair trade coffeein fair trade retailing,” International Journal of Retail
& Distribution Management, 30 (1), 6-17.
MethodologyPatton, M. Q. (2002): Qualitative research &
The sample consisted of 200 participants (120 malesevaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
and 80 females) who were aged from 18 to 54 yearsSage Publications
(mean age 30 years).Shaw, D. et al (2005): “An exploration of values in
The participants were informed that the research wasethical consumer decision making,” Journal of
regarding consumer behaviours and attitudes inConsumer Behaviour, 4 (3), 185-200.
general, but not specifically about any company.Spar, D L. and Lane T. L (2003): “The Power of
Though this sample is clearly not representative of theActivism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global
broad populace and raises concerns of externalBusiness,” California Management Review, 45 (3),
soundness, it is an answer to demographic for coffee78-101.