Corporate Branding Marketing

Corporate brand by any measure is very important toknown for a time.
contemporary organisations. Corporate brand hasAccording to Balmer (2001) a corporate brand is seen
become a valuable asset for a company, which someas a rare entity due to brands unique pattern of
times have value beyond the book value.development. Companies with corporate brands have
To answer the question stated above it is important tocompetitive advantages over those that do not have
explain what a corporate brand is. It is then alsocorporate brand. The brand name, logo plays a vital
important to look into the issue how a corporate brandrole in awareness and it also provides the peace of
is beneficial to an organisation. What kind of financialmind to customers. Olins (2001) classed Manchester
benefit it can give to an organisation and to whatUnited and British Airways as organisations with
extent it helps organisations to gain competitivecorporate brands. Reason that these organisations
advantages over its competitors.have corporate brands is because that's how they
There are several definitions of corporate brandpresented their brands through marketing such as T.V
presented by different authors and scholars. Some ofadvertising, Billboards and other marketing campaigns.
the defamations are as follow:These companies have spend millions of pounds on
David A. Aaker defined corporate brand as "As theadvertising to have a corporate brand, as organsiations
brand that defines the organisation that deliver andwith corporate brand believes that this will give them a
stand behind the offering, the corporate is definedcompetitive advantage. It can be stated by considering
primarily by organisational associations. In particular, aOlins statement that corporate brand is important for
corporate brand will potentially have a rich heritage,the organisations.
assets and capabilities, people, values and priorities, aDavis suggests corporate brands are not required by
local or global frame of reference, and a formancesome companies, for example those that may have a
record."portfolio of brands such as Unilever and Proctor and
(Brand portfolio strategy by David A. Aaker, CaliforniaGamble, tends to use the branding of products rather
management review vol46 no3 spring 2004.)than implementing a corporate brand. This issue of
According to Balmer (2003) the corporate brand isimportance of having a corporate brand has not been
seen as a sixth identity type referred to as thetaken by these major organisations in past for
covenanted identity, which is viewed as independentexample surf is a product by Unilever. Unilever's
and distinct. Balmer (2001) developed the mnemonicgeneral emphasis is on product branding as compare
C2ITE (Cultural, intricate, tangible, ethereal andto one corporate brand. But the importance of a
commitment), this reflects the corporate brands uniquecorporate brand has been explored on these big
attributes and helps understand key characteristics ofcompanies.
the corporate brand.Balmer stated in his journal of general management
While Lawer and Knox (2004) state that a corporate"Mighty proctor and gamble who traditionally espoused
brand is a way to conceive, manage andthe idea that their brands should stand on their two
communicate corporate brand values in order to guideown feet, have realised the importance of managing
managerial decisions, actions and normative firmProctor and Gamble as a brand. The company's chief
behaviour. It can then state that brand is generally theexecutive decided that in the future the company
name of a product or mark of ownership.would be presented as the ultimate corporate brand."
So being able to express its self truly and openly and(Corporate Branding and Connoisseurship by Balmer
then communicate the message to its consumersJ.M.T Journal of management Vol 21 no 1 autumn
clearly.1995.)
"The corporate branding philosophy, at it's core,From statements above it can be stated that
represents an explicit covenant between organisationscorporate brand provides loyalty which means that
and it's key stakeholder groups, including customers"consumers will only stick with one brand and will not
(Balmer & Greyser, 2003)choose any other product. This can true in the case of
Corporate branding can be defined as "Corporateproducts like Rolex or Mercedes but when it comes to
branding refers to the practice of using a company'sever day's essentials such as milk and bread
name as a product brand name. It is an attempt tocorporate branding is in that important, as we will not
leverage corporate brand equity to create producttravel an extra mile to get a Safeway milk. Many
brand recognition."wikipedia.org/wikipeople will just go to a nearest corner shop or a
Corporate_brandingservice station to get a bottle of milk.
The keeping of an organisations promise can lead toOrganisations are now dealing with the much bigger
corporate brand equity; this is when consumers holdchallenge in term of branding. It has discovered that
favourable, strong, and unique associations about thecorporate brand has complicated and difficult rapidly
corporate brand in memory (Keller 1993). There arechanging fundamentals. Balmer (2001) states that
many advantages of corporate branding as corporatecorporate brands are cultural as they reflect the
brands represent the class and well known by everyorganisations subcultures. Consider the example of
body, for example once David Beckham said, "I can'tMercedes its corporate brand stands for high class,
even imagine using any nothing else then Adidas".luxury and high performance and it can be clearly seen
Though he is the contracted model for Adidas but atin sub culture of C-class S-class and M-class.
the same time it reflects that Adidas as luxurious andThe key question arises here should organisations
expensive item and also a status symbol. This madeadapt the concept branding? Corporate brands have
sports people with money buy that item. Rolexgenerally longer life cycle then the product brand.
watches can also be an example for this, Rolex areThere is a bigger drawback attached to corporate
known as the watches for high-class people. Thisbranding as if a company gets a bad publicity of its
makes people with money buy the Rolex watches tocorporate brand it will affect its all the products. Balmer
show the class. This is the brand equity of Adidas and(2003) describes corporate brand as having the role of
Rolex.a driver for many stakeholders, therefore highlighting
Brand equity can be transferred to other products asthe increasing importance of corporate branding. Olins
well. This can be seen in the case of VW buying thesuggested that the organizations with no understanding
Skoda. Before VW took over Skoda's sales wereof what are they about tend to fail in long-term.
declining but in recent years Skoda has improved andCorporate branding must be used properly and
its sales has gone up as well due VW's transferred itsorganisation with strong corporate branding must not
brand equity to Skoda. G.M motors have also boughttake advantage of strong branding and keep the
different corporate brands such as Daewoo andpromises and behave in an ethical way. Coca Cola
Volvo and have transferred the brand equity to themhas used the advantage unethically when first
brands.introduced its water Dasani in U.K and it was later
This does not stop here there are so many otherdiscovered it was nothing but Tap water from general
benefits an organistaion can have by having awater supply. It can also be seen in McDonald's case
corporate brand. Newman (2001) suggests thatthat they portray themselves as an organisation that
success rate of a new product or service cancare about its customers by offering them clean food
increase by twenty percent if it has a corporate brandbut there has been occasions when some of
behind it. Also costs could be reduced when launchingMcDonald's outlets were forced to close down due to
the product or service than if it did not have asupply of unhealthy food. It is important for the
corporate brand supporting it.organisations with strong corporate branding such as
This is due to the trust and credibility build by theCoca Cola, and Mercedes to stick with the values
organisations. Consumers prefer to stay with thethey present.
organisation they have dealt with before. WhenEssay above suggests that the corporate brands are
Mercedes build the 4*4 people have bought thecreated to obtain the significance awareness in a
vehicles even though it was the first time Mercedescompetitive market. Corporate brand have impact both
has launched a 4*4 vehicle. Mercedes has achievedexternally and internally. Corporate brand have many
this through due to the string branding and consumerbenefits such as gaining the competitive advantages
trust on them.over its competitors and achieving the economies of
Corporate brand has a longer life as compare to otherscale. Organisation must manage their corporate
resources with in the company. For example Cocabrands effectively and efficiently in order to get the
Cola the brand is much older then the plants andmaximum benefit.
location used to make it. It is also older then the humanIt can also conclude from the authors mentioned
resources those make the product. Grant (1991) statedabove that many organisations without a strong
that the corporate brand tends to decay slowly, andcorporate brand will face difficulties in coming future.
strong corporate brands can decrease the competitionSo organisations without a corporate brand such as
in the market. Products have shorter lifecycle soProctor and Gamble and Unilever have to work
corporate brands are preferred over just producttowards achieving one strong corporate brand.
brand.Effective and strategic support of a corporate brand
A corporate brand is an intangible asset so it is difficultcan make it easier for organisations to do business.
to copy as it is not a product from a production line.Corporate brand is stronger then the quality and price
Corporate brand represents a logo or a slogan that isof a product but to make it successful right strategies
protected by laws, which are in place. Slogans or logosare required.
are more secure then the product it self as it is easySo as John Stewart, former CEO, Quaker stated, "If
to copy a product but it is nearly impossible to copy athis business were split up, I would give you the land
logo.and bricks and mortar, and I would take the brands
Corporate brand helps achieving the economies ofand trademarks, and I would fare better then you."
scope, which means it is less costly for a firm toBibliography
produce two separate products than for twoAckerman L.D., (2000) Identity is Destiny, Leadership
specialized firms to produce them separately. Forand the roots of value creation, Berrett-Koelher
example Nike has a slogan of "Just Do It" across thepublishers
globe and through its advertising Nike can promote itsArgetni P & Druckenmiller B, (2004) Reputation
different products and services.and the Corporate Brand, Corporate Reputation
Due to advancement in technology and inReview
communication world is becoming a small community.Balmer J.M.T. & Greyser A.G., (2003), Revealing
Consumers are more knowledgeable then ever.the Corporation, perspectives on identity, image,
Globalisation is common between all the bigreputation, corporate branding and corporate-level
organisations. Corporate brand is important for themarketing, Routledge, Cornwall
globalise organisations to show that their core value isBalmer J.M.T Journal of management, Corporate
same wherever the product is.Branding and Connoisseurship Vol 21 no 1 autumn 1995.
Corporate branding is also very useful whenBalmer. J (2001) ' The Three Virtues and Seven
organisations want to enter into a new market. ThisDeadly Sins of Corporate Brand Management' Journal
can be seen when Samsung entered into mobileof General Management, 27, (1), 1-17
communication market, Samsung did not have muchBarich, H and Kotler, P/ (1991), "A framework for
experience in mobile market but their recent mobilemarketing image management", Sloan Management
model Samsung D500 has outclassed Nokia andReview, Vol. 32, No. 2
Motorola's models. This is gain mainly throughDavid A. Aaker, California management review, Brand
innovation but brand equity played its part as well.portfolio strategy vol46 no3 spring 2004.
Samsung is brand which consumers can trust and isDavis S.