Disgruntled Franchisee Lashes Out

Sometimes crises are "big deals." Sometimes they'reentirely at the franchiser's expense. He had then
situations that can crop up in any industry, but fit thetwisted the facts about business practices and thrown
Webster's Collegiate dictionary definition of crisis asin some facts -- that board members HAD been
"an unstable or crucial time or state of affairs whoseinvolved in past lawsuits. What he didn't say was that
outcome will make a decisive difference for better orthose lawsuits had not involved the board members
worse." If mishandled, the situation below, modified towhile they were with the current franchiser and all had
preserve confidentiality, COULD have become a "bigbeen minor civil cases resulting, at worst, in very
deal."low-cost settlements. In other words, "routine business
Situationexperiences."
A franchiser suddenly started getting calls fromHowever, damage had been done. The disgruntled
concerned franchisees. They had been contacted byfranchisee had already contacted approximately one
a relatively new franchisee who had pointed out adozen of his peers and the company knew the rumor
number of things he felt were illegal or unethical aboutmill would spread the word to many others.
the franchiser's business practices. He had also allegedThe in-house counsel and PR/crisis management
that some of the franchiser's board of directors hadconsultant put their heads together and, ultimately, what
been involved in multiple past lawsuits -- the implicationresulted was:
being that they were previously accused ofThe disgruntled franchisee was asked to write a letter
wrongdoing and shouldn't be trusted.to all whom he had contacted, one actually drafted by
Initial Management Reactionlegal and PR counsel, apologizing for causing alarm and
Management, appropriately, told the concerned callerscorrecting the facts. In return, the company offered a
that they could understand how such information mightmore-than-generous method by which the franchisee
upset them and asked for a little time to check outcould get out of his deal. This avoided a lawsuit against
what was being said, and by whom, beforethe franchisee that would have been negative PR for
responding. They wisely did not immediately denythe company, even if they "won" in court.
allegations, knowing that they were hearingHis letter was accompanied by one from the
second-hand information, and that there was somecompany, offering to answer any questions the
limited truth regarding the issue of past lawsuits.recipients might have and communicating, in essence,
Crisis Managementthat they were forgiving of the disgruntled franchisee's
Response, from that point on, proceeded on twotrespasses.
concurrent fronts: legal and PR. The franchiser'sThe same letter was kept on standby for use with
in-house counsel contacted the franchisee who hadany other franchisees who heard via the rumor-mill.
made the allegations and found that the franchiseeA contingency statement was written for use with
was worried that he'd committed to his franchise tootrade and franchise media if they got wind of the
fast and, actually, was looking for a way out. His initialrumors.
inquiries to the franchiser on this subject had beenThe situation calmed and has not returned to haunt the
rebuffed simply because he was asking to get outfranchiser.