Military Media Relations During Wars

There have been media reports that the military hasbriefings; the Sierra Leone intervention, despite the
been talking out of turn, and counter views have alsoIndian contingent being actually responsible for the
been expressed on the topic by some supposedsuccess of the mission, was over shadowed by the
thinkers. It is not by individual perceptions that policiesBritish media which highlighted the contributions made
are made and the subject, in today's context needs toby the British troops in the success of the operations.
debated with select examples of the world militaryHowever, damage control was carried out by the
media relations kept as a backdrop and the examplesIndian Foreign Service at a later stage more as a
of using the various media tools as force multipliers.reaction by sending the Indian media to cover the
Military has opened up to the media only recently.happenings, bringing to focus the Indian Army actions
Kargil operation was the first televised war, whichwhich brought about peace in the Region. More
brought the conflict to peoples homes. It showed therecently, the American coalition war in Iraq was again
war zone to the world and changed people'sa reminder that a war can be projected as a justifiable
perception on the pattern of conflict in high altitudewar, if the events are doctored well and projected
areas. It reduced the gap between the military and theselectively.
civilians and connected people with the lives of soldiers,The above examples bring to focus one important
who carry out their duties even at the peril of theiraspect, and that is, media has to be intelligently applied
lives. It is in their prompt response at the borders thatand it must be situation oriented. It cannot adorn a
our countrymen can remain comfortable at theirtemplate which has to dittoed in all situations and the
homes. It was a bonding established and a nationalcontent also has to vary. An over or an under play will
fervour built which brought about unity in diversity. Theneither be good for the public nor for the military. The
up front reportage altered the world opinion in ourresponses from the military have to be couched and
favour and justified the conflict, making Pakistan thewell articulated. A total ban on interaction with the
bad guy. All this happened only because the media bymedia will give rise to speculation and invariably result in
India was handled with an aim, a vision and the public, inmisreporting. An over eager, inadequately thought of
many ways participated in the conflict.hurried response, is again likely to give a negative
The negatives, to balance out, have also been true,projection. The bait by the media will always be given
with at times some media personnel being givenwith smiling faces approaching the military and wanting
preferential treatment by the military and the sameto be the first to report an incident and in the bargain
media men, when rubbished on an occasion havegetting access to an event. It may also be that the
been nasty in the reporting about the military. Suchmilitary, at times may feel that some other security
practices are reasonably common, despite the users inagency may take the credit for the task accomplished
the game being quite aware, and such practices areand therefore prematurely reveal some details to
bound to take place in a democratic system, yet it ispre-empt the other stake holders, which at times may
important to analyse the reasons for the reportersresult in tendering apologies at a later stage.
adopting a sudden change in their outlook. It must beSuch out of turn exposures to the media must be
appreciated, after all, they are also individuals andguarded against and that comes with fore thought and
bound to err and swing one way or the other topractice. Hence, it is important that media education is
gauge the mood swing of the readers.imparted to the military as a professional subject. It
Just prior to Kargil, Kosovo happened, and just a littleshould be taught in schools of instructions right from
later the United Nations Force launched an operation inentrée level and should be practiced over the
Sierra Leone. A brief mention of the two will facilitate inyears. The importance of the information warfare with
framing opinions on the media being used as amedia as a force multiplier has to be understood and it
weapon system. While Kosovo was a 'War of Will' athas to be correctly used as a weapon of decision
least as projected by the western media, which gavemaking, a weapon of success.
only a one sided picture with Mr Reuben giving his daily