Protecting Reputation - PR Pros Allowing High-Profile Clients to Fail - Call a Reputation Czar Pt 1

Communication professionals (including public relations,for the executives' reputations? Apparently not their
public affairs, government affairs, both in-house andinternal or external communication folks.
agency) have recently allowed several high-profileSecond, on February 10th Treasury Secretary
clients, in high-stake situations, fail.Geithner presented the Obama administration's
What was once assumed to be a major responsibilityfinancial sector relief plan. Sir Timothy (I refer to him as
of those providing PR counsel has somehow beensuch because he was touted as the "white knight in
neglected, with very public, very significantshining armor" who could rescue Wall Street) had
consequences.flawed messaging which he conveyed with an
Perhaps that is why Pfizer announced a newuninspiring, lackluster delivery. How did the market
position--VP, Corporate Reputation and Policyreact? It lost 5% in value in a day. Who was looking
Communication. Its role? Build Pfizer's reputation.out for the Secretary's reputation and effectiveness?
Though still working under Pfizer's head of publicApparently no one.
relations, the responsibility is now with one person.Third, two weeks later on February 24th, Louisiana
Pfizer management decided reputation needed moreGovernor Bobby Jindal delivered the Republican
emphasis and created in effect, a reputation czar.response to President Obama's Address to Congress.
Executives in high-profile, high-stake situations also mayHis "speech" was an article, not a speech. The staging
need a reputation czar, if their staff and public relationsmade him appear awkward, ill at ease. And so the
counsel are failing them. Consider three majorgovernor, an intelligent man, well liked by his
communication disasters that happened in just over aconstituents looked stiff, boring and clearly not ready
three-month period in late 2008 and early 2009.for prime time. Who was watching out for the
First, on November 19th, Detroit's "Big Three" autogovernor? It might have been the Republican National
execs came to Congress asking for a bailout. TheirCommittee, except the recent change in its leadership
messages were weak, and left the impression thediffused its focus. And it may well have been that the
executives hadn't given much thought as to what theygovernor's staff didn't know what to look out for.
would say or what the committee and the AmericanIn all three cases a reputation czar would have
public wanted to hear. But that failure wasprotected the speakers' best interests and increased
overshadowed by the defining moment of thethe results each wanted.
testimony: Each of the government bailout executivesWhat about you or your clients? Do you have a
had flown to DC in his company's corporate jet at areputation czar looking out for your reputation?
cost of $20,000 per executive. Who was looking out