Successful Thought Leadership for Law Firms

Although a somewhat pretentious-sounding expression,strategic level. Once this relationship is established the
the “term thought leadership” has gaineddoor is open to providing services to deal with these
widespread usage across the business service andtrends.
technology sectors and increasingly those working inResearcher Fiona Czerniawska identifies six reasons
law firm marketing. A quick Google search revealsfor seeking to establish thought leadership: internal
over one million pages using the expression, includingknowledge sharing; recognition among clients;
numerous consultancies paying it for the privilege ofreinforcing relationships; lead generation; differentiation;
their link appearing when the term is input.and/or agenda setting. Generally, the more senior-level
Whether you like the term or not, it is about thean audience you need to reach, the more your
inarguably beneficial practice of establishing a clearmaterial needs to be at a strategic, public policy and
lead in a market through identifying major trends early,‘agenda setting’ level: the lower down the
aligning your services with meeting the consequencescorporate hierarchy, the more technical and specific
of these trends, positioning your firm as the marketthe content should be.
leaders and, ideally, charging a premium through beingFor example, one of my clients embarked on a
recognised as the leader in this area.thought leadership campaign because its senior
Where it differs from more established marketing is itsbanking clients had stopped coming to its partners for
emphasis on building a reputation for expertise throughtheir opinion when they had a major problem. This is
sharing new ideas with clients and otherexactly the sort of reputation problem that a campaign
opinion-formers – ideas that are interesting, relevantof insightful research can address when backed up by
and thought-provoking. (As opposed to much standarda strong and persistent marketing campaign, providing
practice of hitting prospects over the head with a fatthe firm with strong content and insights to enable it to
brochure full of credentials). Simple in theory, but muchre-engage at board level, combined with media
harder in practice. Perhaps as a consequence thecoverage providing a public reaffirmation of them being
term has become widely debased by people using itleading commentators.
to cover many forms of marketing communicationsThis of course highlights an important aspect to bear in
The main tool consultancy and larger accountancymind. Thought leadership campaigns are hard work,
firms use to position themselves as having leadingtime-consuming and are a long-term investment. The
expertise is through commissioning research into thefinal report won’t market itself – seminars,
opinions of executives or other decision-makers.meetings, PR, mailings, newsletters, articles and
Indeed this is such a common tactic for them that thepresentations are all needed to rapidly disseminate
large accounting firms issued more survey-basedinsights while they are still fresh, using the relationships
research in January than all the leading law firmsgenerated to gain appointments for your firm. Clearly a
combined in the whole of 2007.plan is required and resources identified. An
But even when the large law firms did invest in opinionunderstanding managing partner or departmental head
research, their output falls wide of the mark with manyis essential.
merely presenting the research findings with littleHow to start a thought leadership programme
interpretation or development of the implications fromFirms should not see thought leadership as equating to
their findings.doing an opinion survey or other forms of research
One example of the right approach was a reportinto emerging issues. Certainly surveys are good ways
published last year by Osborne Clarke into the sourcingof getting robust and interesting material for reports,
strategies of large businesses. Research as part ofbut if you can’t afford opinion research there are
this, undertaken by Acritas, allowed Osborne Clark toother options. First, you need interesting hypotheses
identify that two thirds of businesses now take a moreand developing these is key. Your own experience
collaborative ‘open-book’ approach to workingmay point you in good directions, but you need to
with their suppliers, forming the basis for them tobeware of lawyers with strong views or a narrow
provide advice on the implications of this shift to a lessperspective (including yourself) being too prescriptive.
adversarial relationship with suppliers.Perspectives from clients and industry participants are
However, thought leadership is not something that isneeded.
reserved for big firms who can afford researchI recommend starting with discussion dinners where
agencies. Smaller law firms, especially those who findclients and your colleagues discuss industry issues in
themselves competing against teams in large firms,the broadest terms. Not only are these easy to do and
have the most to gain by combining their nimbleness,convivial, the insights emerging from these, if facilitated
lack of client conflicts and coal-face insights to helpproperly, will be hugely beneficial in informing your next
them stand out.steps, aside from any additional business development
So why should lawyers care about being thoughtopportunities such events can generate. Thorough
leaders?desk research (that is, reviewing research by other
Lawyers have always attempted to establish theirfirms and bodies) is important. It will throw up ideas, it
intellectual firepower through publishing erudite articlesmay well provide useful data, and it certainly will help
on rulings and other legal developments. However,you avoid investing in research that someone else has
such articles are generally only read by other lawyersrecently done. Certainly, the insights from this alone
so this has become of less relevance in today’smay well have opened up numerous opportunities for
business world. The challenge for lawyers is toengaging with clients and as content for a PR
combine their understanding of the law with emergingprogramme or the basis for further, more detailed,
trends, interpreting the consequences of these in orderresearch programme.
to engage with clients and prospects at a more