The First Rule of Marketing

Marketing Rule #1director lacks the training and experience to actually do
Take charge of your marketing.the work and, second, because the hired guns can
No one cares about your success like you do - not antake the blame if the company doesn't hit its revenue
ad agency, not a marketing director. Do not leave yourtargets.
marketing oversight to others.Smaller and medium-sized businesses aren't as bad
Over the last 30 years or so, there has been a subtleabout this as corporations, but the weakness there is
but crucial shift in how many companies manage theirthat the owner-entrepreneur is often so torn between
advertising, public relations and marketing.having to manage money and people, networking for
Prior to the 1980s, marketing was usually a C-levelnew clients and sometimes even answering the
activity. It was considered so important to the ongoingphones, that she may entrust the business' promotion
success of a business that the company CEO or atto a family member, friend or almost ANYone who
least an executive vice-president directly oversaw it.can take it off her shoulders.
In recent years, the CEO's focus has shifted almostPut all these flaws together and you understand why
entirely to driving short-term shareholder profit. Wherea huge amount of marketing today is either bland,
once a company head had perhaps five to ten yearsplay-it-safe me-too-ism or else wildly inconsistent as
to prove his or her worth, today CEOs are hired andnew marketing directors and agencies come and go in
fired on the results of just a few quarters' profits.one-year bursts.
The result is that marketing has been shunted off toMarketing must be overseen at the highest level of
lower-rank officers in the business such as acompany authority or it will be prone to failure. No one
marketing director or communications officer, often a- not a marketing director, not an ad agency - cares
junior executive who may not have much real cloutabout the company's success like the owner or chief
within the company.officer.
A second factor is that - by emphasizing transientMarketing directors care about looking good - or at
gains over long-term growth - jobs within theleast not looking bad. Agency people care most about
organization have become more short-term too, tied toboosting their companies' revenues. Sure, they all hope
quarterly earnings. Today, marketing jobs at manythey'll build the company but if not - oh, well, on to the
companies are seen as just a temporary "gig," anext business. After all, it's not their money that is being
stepping-stone to something better.gambled with.
The result is that the marketing at quite a fewIf it IS your money that is going into marketing, you're
businesses these days is being managed by:o afoolish to leave the oversight of that effort to anyone
less-experienced person;o often young;o with littlebut yourself. That's certainly not to say that the
interest in consistency or long-term resultscompany CEO should be cranking out press releases
He is often more concerned with promoting himself foror responding to every comment on the company
his NEXT position.blog, but she SHOULD be regularly checking that those
The marketing director will then usually hand off thethings are being done in a manner that is consistent
responsibility for the company's marketing to an adwith her vision, goals and the long-term image of the
agency or PR firm. First, because the marketingenterprise.